Alberto Manguel. A History of Reading
"Altogether," Kafka wrote in 1904 to his friend Oskar Pollak, "I think we ought to read only books that bite and sting us. If the book we are reading doesn't shake us awake like a blow on the skull, why bother reading it in the first place? So that it can make us happy, as you put it? Good God, we'd be just as happy if we had no books at all; books that make us happy we could, in a pinch, also write ourselves. What we need are books that hit us like a most painful misfortune, like the death of someone we loved more than we love ourselves, that make us feel as though we had been banished to the woods, far from any human presence, like a suicide. A book must be the axe for the frozen sea within us. That is what I believe" (p. 93).
But there is something other than entertainment which one derives from reading in bed: a particular quality of privacy. Reading in bed is a self-centered act, immobile, free from ordinary social conventions, invisible to the world, and one that, because it takes place between the sheets, in the realm of lust and sinful idleness, has something of the thrill of things forbidden(Alberto Manuel. A History of Reading. New York: Viking, 1996, p. 153).
1 Comments:
Hey, great idea, Luke. It's good to see you on the web.
I'm wondering if you could maybe put some of your wonderful old "summer reading lists" on this site, the ones the students and your faculty colleagues alike used to enjoy so much. Summer IS a coming up.
Since I retired I don't know if you still do those, but the old ones are still relevant for readers. I'm going to have a literary theory site up and running soon.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home